Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

DeepSeek-R1

S-TIER

Chutes.ai

Intelligence Score 97/100
Context Window 64K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

DeepSeek-R1 Wins

With an intelligence score of 97/100 vs 92/100, DeepSeek-R1 outperforms GPT-4o (via Coze) by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via Coze)
DeepSeek-R1
Context Window
128K 64K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~92-95%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 Jan 2025
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model Varies (community capacity)
Daily Limit
Token-based daily limits Subject to availability
Capabilities
Vision
Reasoning
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
Medium 🐢 Slower (Reasoning)
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 🧠 Complex Reasoning
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
  • Availability depends on community GPU donors
  • Speed varies with demand
  • Models may be temporarily unavailable
Key Strengths
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace
  • Community-powered GPU network
  • Free access to large open-source models
  • OpenAI-compatible API format

Similar Comparisons

GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o
DeepSeek-R1
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
DeepSeek-R1
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct