Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Grok 2 Mini

A-TIER

xAI

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via Coze) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 87/100, GPT-4o (via Coze) outperforms Grok 2 Mini by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Grok 2 Mini
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~80-84%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model Varies
Daily Limit
Token-based daily limits Based on tier
Capabilities
Vision
Streaming
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
  • API key required
Key Strengths
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace
  • Fast
  • Efficient
  • Real-time data access

Similar Comparisons

GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o
Grok 2 Mini
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Grok-2 Vision
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Grok-2