Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o (via Coze)
S-TIERCoze
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Llama 3.1 405B
S-TIERVenice.ai
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
128K tokens
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o (via Coze) Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 91/100, GPT-4o (via Coze) outperforms Llama 3.1 405B by 1 point.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o (via Coze)
|
Llama 3.1 405B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128K tokens |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by model | 10 RPM (free tier) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Token-based daily limits | Limited daily usage |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | 🐢 Slower (Reasoning) |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | 405B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct