Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open

Llama 3 (Local)

Jan.ai

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window System RAM dependent
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via Coze) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o (via Coze) outperforms Llama 3 (Local) by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via Coze).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Llama 3 (Local)
Context Window
128K System RAM dependent
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~60-64%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
Token-based daily limits Unlimited
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
  • Requires decent hardware (RAM/GPU)
  • Battery drain on laptops
  • Local model quality vs GPT-4
Key Strengths
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace
  • One-click Model Downloader
  • Built-in Local API Server
  • GPU Acceleration (NVIDIA/Metal/Vulkan)

Similar Comparisons