Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via Coze) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 81/100, GPT-4o (via Coze) outperforms LLaVA 1.5 by 11 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via Coze)
LLaVA 1.5
Context Window
128K Local
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~75-79%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
Token-based daily limits Unlimited
Capabilities
Vision
Vision
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server

Similar Comparisons

GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o
LLaVA 1.5
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Mistral 7B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Mistral 7B
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
TinyLlama
LLaVA 1.5
vs
TinyLlama
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)