Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

stability-ai/sdxl

A-TIER

Replicate

Intelligence Score 84/100
Context Window Image
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via Coze) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 84/100, GPT-4o (via Coze) outperforms stability-ai/sdxl by 8 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via Coze)
stability-ai/sdxl
Context Window
128K Image
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~75-79%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model Varies by model
Daily Limit
Token-based daily limits Credit-based
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
  • Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive)
  • Cold starts for less popular models
  • Trial credits are minimal
Key Strengths
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace
  • Run any public model with an API
  • Fine-tune existing models easily
  • Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models

Similar Comparisons

GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
mistralai/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2
stability-ai/sdxl
vs
mistralai/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
stability-ai/sdxl
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o
stability-ai/sdxl
vs
GPT-4o
stability-ai/sdxl
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
stability-ai/sdxl
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)