Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Command R7B (12-2024)

A-TIER

Cohere

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 87/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Command R7B (12-2024) by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via routing)
Command R7B (12-2024)
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~80-84%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 20 requests/minute
Daily Limit
Credit-based -
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) 7B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Monthly quota shared across all models
  • 1,000 API calls/month on free tier
  • Commercial use restricted on free plan
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) built-in
  • Enterprise-grade models
  • Embeddings and reranking models

Similar Comparisons