Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Gemma 2 (Local)

Jan.ai

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window System RAM dependent
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Gemma 2 (Local) by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via routing)
Gemma 2 (Local)
Context Window
128K System RAM dependent
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~60-64%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
Credit-based Unlimited
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Requires decent hardware (RAM/GPU)
  • Battery drain on laptops
  • Local model quality vs GPT-4
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • One-click Model Downloader
  • Built-in Local API Server
  • GPU Acceleration (NVIDIA/Metal/Vulkan)

Similar Comparisons