Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

OpenRouter

Intelligence Score 93/100

Context Window 1M

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 92/100, Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free) outperforms GPT-4o (via routing) by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	GPT-4o (via routing)	Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Context Window	128K	1M
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~85-87%	~88-91%
Release Date	May-Nov 2024	Dec 2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	20 requests/minute
Daily Limit	Credit-based	50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup)
Capabilities	Vision	No specific data
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size	~1.8T (estimated)	~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Limits depend on account history/topup Community key models Free models have lower priority during peak demand
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Unified API for 100+ models from all providers OpenAI-compatible endpoint (drop-in replacement) Automatic model fallback and routing