Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Qwen 1.5 7B Chat

Cloudflare Workers AI

Intelligence Score 71/100
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 71/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Qwen 1.5 7B Chat by 21 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via routing)
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
Context Window
128K 32K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~65-69%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Varies by model
Daily Limit
Credit-based 10,000 neurons/day
Capabilities
Vision
Chinese
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) 7B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • 10,000 neurons/day cap (varies per model)
  • Larger models consume more neurons per request
  • No fine-tuning support
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Edge inference: runs closest to user
  • 50+ models: LLM, image gen, classification, speech
  • Workers integration for serverless apps

Similar Comparisons