Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Yi Large Turbo

A-TIER

01.AI

Intelligence Score 86/100
Context Window 16K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 86/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Yi Large Turbo by 6 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via routing)
Yi Large Turbo
Context Window
128K 16K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~80-84%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 10,000 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Based on tier
Capabilities
Vision
Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing

Similar Comparisons

GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
Yi Large Turbo
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
yi-large
Yi Large Turbo
vs
yi-large
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
yi-vision
Yi Large Turbo
vs
yi-vision
Yi Large Turbo
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Yi Large Turbo
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Yi Large Turbo
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)