Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o

S-TIER

OpenAI

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model

Flux.1 Dev

S-TIER

Hugging Face Inference

Intelligence Score 91/100
Context Window Image
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 91/100, GPT-4o outperforms Flux.1 Dev by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o
Flux.1 Dev
Context Window
128K Image
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Diffusion
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~85-87%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
10,000 RPM 300 Requests / hour
Daily Limit
Based on tier Dependent on global load
Capabilities
Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 🎨 Image Generation
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
  • Rate limited to ~300 request/hour for free users
  • Models larger than 10GB may not load
  • Cold starts can occur
Key Strengths
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing
  • Serverless Inference
  • Instant Model Loading
  • Text Generation

Similar Comparisons

GPT-4o
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Flux.1 Dev
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Flux.1 Dev
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Flux.1 Dev
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Flux.1 Dev
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Flux.1 Dev
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Flux.1 Dev
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)