Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o

S-TIER

OpenAI

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model

Gemma 2 9B Instruct

A-TIER

Hugging Face Inference

Intelligence Score 80/100
Context Window 8k
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 80/100, GPT-4o outperforms Gemma 2 9B Instruct by 12 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Context Window
128K 8k
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~75-79%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
10,000 RPM 300 Requests / hour
Daily Limit
Based on tier Dependent on global load
Capabilities
Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) 9B
Limitations
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
  • Rate limited to ~300 request/hour for free users
  • Models larger than 10GB may not load
  • Cold starts can occur
Key Strengths
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing
  • Serverless Inference
  • Instant Model Loading
  • Text Generation

Similar Comparisons

GPT-4o
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Gemma 2 9B
GPT-4o
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Flux.1 Dev
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Gemma 2 (Local)
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)