Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o
S-TIEROpenAI
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model
Qwen 2.5
LLM7.io
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o outperforms Qwen 2.5 by 27 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o
|
Qwen 2.5
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
10,000 RPM | 30 RPM (no signup) / 120 RPM (free email token) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Based on tier | Up to 5M tokens/day (rolling 24h, with free token) |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B