Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o
S-TIEROpenAI
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
A-TIERSambaNova Cloud
Intelligence Score
89/100
Context Window
32k Context
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 89/100, GPT-4o outperforms Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B by 3 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o
|
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 32k Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
10,000 RPM | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
Based on tier | Dependent on credits |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | 32B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct