Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o
S-TIEROpenAI
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
A-TIERHugging Face Inference
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 83/100, GPT-4o outperforms Qwen3.5 72B Instruct by 9 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o
|
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
10,000 RPM | 300 Requests / hour |
|
Daily Limit
|
Based on tier | Capped by monthly credit, not a flat request count |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
Chinese
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
GPT-4o
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Flux.1 Dev
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen3.5 (Cloud)