Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-OSS 20B
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 8k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
S-TIERDeepInfra
Intelligence Score
92/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct outperforms GPT-OSS 20B by 27 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-OSS 20B
|
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 8k TPM | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 60 RPM (varies by model) |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Credit-based (no daily cap) |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | 🐢 Slower (Reasoning) |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
20B | 405B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-OSS 20B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
GPT-OSS 20B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
GPT-OSS 20B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct