Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 2
S-TIERxAI
Intelligence Score
94/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 2 Wins
With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 65/100, Grok 2 outperforms Llama 3.1 (Deployable) by 29 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 2.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 2
|
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~88-91% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies | Pay-per-second compute |
|
Daily Limit
|
Based on tier | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
Function Calling
Streaming
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 2
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Grok 2
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Grok 2
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct