Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 2
S-TIERxAI
Intelligence Score
94/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model
Qwen3 32B
DEPRECATEDGroq
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
79/100
Context Window
1k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 2 Wins
With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 79/100, Grok 2 outperforms Qwen3 32B by 15 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 2.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 2
|
Qwen3 32B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 1k RPD, 6k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~88-91% | ~70-74% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Based on tier | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
Function Calling
Streaming
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 32B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 2
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Grok 2
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3 32B
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Grok 2
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 32B
vs
Qwen3 32B (Fast)
Qwen3 32B
vs
Allam 2 7B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B