Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
grok-4.6
S-TIERGrokified
Intelligence Score
98/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Unknown
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen 2.5
LLM7.io
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
grok-4.6 Wins
With an intelligence score of 98/100 vs 65/100, grok-4.6 outperforms Qwen 2.5 by 33 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for grok-4.6.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
grok-4.6
|
Qwen 2.5
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
Unknown | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
No request-count cap; 32K input tokens/request | 30 RPM (no signup) / 120 RPM (free email token) |
|
Daily Limit
|
$8/day and $3/hour of free credit | Up to 5M tokens/day (rolling 24h, with free token) |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
grok-4.6
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
grok-4.6
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
grok-4.6
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B