Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
grok-4.6
S-TIERGrokified
Intelligence Score
98/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Unknown
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
A-TIERHugging Face Inference
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
grok-4.6 Wins
With an intelligence score of 98/100 vs 83/100, grok-4.6 outperforms Qwen3.5 72B Instruct by 15 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for grok-4.6.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
grok-4.6
|
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
Unknown | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
No request-count cap; 32K input tokens/request | 300 Requests / hour |
|
Daily Limit
|
$8/day and $3/hour of free credit | Capped by monthly credit, not a flat request count |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Chinese
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
grok-4.6
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
grok-4.6
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
grok-4.6
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Flux.1 Dev
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B