Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Groq Compound Mini
DEPRECATEDGroq
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
A-TIERNVIDIA NIM
Intelligence Score
80/100
Context Window
Long context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) Wins
With an intelligence score of 80/100 vs 65/100, DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) outperforms Groq Compound Mini by 15 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813).
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Groq Compound Mini
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
250 RPD, 70k TPM | Long context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Dense Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 40 requests/minute |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | - |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Groq Compound Mini
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
Groq Compound Mini
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound Mini
vs
DeepSeek: V4 Flash (free)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek: V4 Flash (free)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek-R1 (Free)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek Coder V2
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
Various Open Models
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
Llama 4 Scout