Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Groq Compound Mini
Groq
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
S-TIEROpenRouter
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 65/100, Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) outperforms Groq Compound Mini by 31 points.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Groq Compound Mini
|
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
250 RPD, 70k TPM | 1M |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~92-95% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Dec 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 20 requests/minute |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | 50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup) |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | ~1.5T (estimated) |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|