Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Groq Compound Mini

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Groq Compound Mini by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via routing).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Groq Compound Mini	GPT-4o (via routing)
Context Window	250 RPD, 70k TPM	128K
Architecture	Transformer	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~85-87%
Release Date	2024	May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	30 RPM, 14.4k RPD	60 RPM
Daily Limit	14,400 Requests/Day	Credit-based
Capabilities	No specific data	Vision
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	⚡ Very Fast	Medium
Primary Use Case	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations	Test	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths	LPU Accelerated Extremely Fast Inference Open Source Models	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing