Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Groq Compound Mini
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
A-TIERCerebras
Intelligence Score
87/100
Context Window
8K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast) Wins
With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 70B (Fast) outperforms Groq Compound Mini by 22 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.1 70B (Fast).
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Groq Compound Mini
|
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
250 RPD, 70k TPM | 8K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 30 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | 1,000,000 Tokens / Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 70B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Groq Compound Mini
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick (free)
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Scout (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Scout (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 70B (Fast)
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct