Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Google

Intelligence Score 99/100

Context Window 2M

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

Commercial/Paid Model

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 99/100 vs 65/100, Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms Groq Compound by 34 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Gemini 3.1 Pro.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Groq Compound	Gemini 3.1 Pro
Context Window	250 RPD, 70k TPM	2M
Architecture	Transformer	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~92-95%
Release Date	2024	2026 (Expected)
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	30 RPM, 14.4k RPD	2,000 RPM
Daily Limit	14,400 Requests/Day	1,500 requests/day (free tier)
Capabilities	No specific data	Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode Web Search
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size	Undisclosed	~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations	Test	API key required Rate limits vary by region
Key Strengths	LPU Accelerated Extremely Fast Inference Open Source Models	Complex tasks Creative concepts Best-in-class reasoning