Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

GPT-4o

S-TIER

OpenAI

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o outperforms Groq Compound by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Groq Compound
GPT-4o
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD 10,000 RPM
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Based on tier
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Test
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing

Similar Comparisons

Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
GPT-4o
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Groq Compound
vs
Qwen3 32B
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen3 32B
Groq Compound
vs
Allam 2 7B
GPT-4o
vs
Allam 2 7B
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 4 Scout
GPT-4o
vs
Whisper Large v3
GPT-4o
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo