Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Llama 3.1 70B
A-TIERLepton AI
Intelligence Score
87/100
Context Window
8K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 70B Wins
With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 70B outperforms Groq Compound by 22 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.1 70B.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Groq Compound
|
Llama 3.1 70B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
250 RPD, 70k TPM | 8K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | âš¡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 70B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Groq Compound
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Groq Compound
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct