Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
A-TIERHugging Face Inference
Intelligence Score
82/100
Context Window
128k
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Wins
With an intelligence score of 82/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.2 11B Vision outperforms Groq Compound by 17 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.2 11B Vision.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Groq Compound
|
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
250 RPD, 70k TPM | 128k |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Sep 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 300 Requests / hour |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Dependent on global load |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Text
Vision
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 👁️ Vision & Multimodal |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 11B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Groq Compound
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Groq Compound
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Flux.1 Dev
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct