Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Mistral Nemo 12B

A-TIER

Ollama

Intelligence Score 84/100
Context Window 32K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Mistral Nemo 12B Wins

With an intelligence score of 84/100 vs 65/100, Mistral Nemo 12B outperforms Groq Compound by 19 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Mistral Nemo 12B.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Groq Compound
Mistral Nemo 12B
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM 32K tokens
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD Hardware limited
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
Multilingual
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 12B
Limitations
  • Test
  • Depends on your RAM/GPU
  • Laptop fans will spin up
  • Large models (70B+) need heavy hardware
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Local Inference: Data never leaves your device
  • Modelfiles: Script your own system prompts
  • API: Local REST API for app integration

Similar Comparisons

Groq Compound
vs
Mistral: Small 3 (free)
Mistral Nemo 12B
vs
Mistral: Small 3 (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Mistral 7B
Mistral Nemo 12B
vs
Mistral 7B
Groq Compound
vs
Mistral Small
Mistral Nemo 12B
vs
Mistral Small
Mistral Nemo 12B
vs
Mistral Nemo
Mistral Nemo 12B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Mistral Nemo 12B
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Mistral Nemo 12B
vs
Phi-3.5 Mini
Mistral Nemo 12B
vs
DeepSeek Coder V2
Mistral Nemo 12B
vs
Mistral (Any version)