Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Groq Compound

DEPRECATED

Groq

This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Step 3.7 Flash

A-TIER

Routeway

Intelligence Score 83/100
Context Window See provider
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Step 3.7 Flash Wins

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, Step 3.7 Flash outperforms Groq Compound by 18 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Groq Compound
Step 3.7 Flash
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM See provider
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD 5 RPM (community submission)
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day 200 requests/day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Test
  • Free capacity and limits can change; verify on the provider site
  • Listed from community submissions - partly verified
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • OpenAI-compatible API
  • Multi-model access

Similar Comparisons

Groq Compound
vs
Allam 2 7B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Allam 2 7B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Whisper Large v3
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Groq Compound Mini
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B