Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Yi Large Turbo

A-TIER

01.AI

Intelligence Score 86/100
Context Window 16K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

Yi Large Turbo Wins

With an intelligence score of 86/100 vs 65/100, Yi Large Turbo outperforms Groq Compound by 21 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Yi Large Turbo.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Groq Compound
Yi Large Turbo
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM 16K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD 10,000 RPM
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Based on tier
Capabilities
No specific data
Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Test
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing

Similar Comparisons

Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
Yi Large Turbo
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
Yi Large Turbo
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Yi Large Turbo
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Yi Large Turbo
vs
Qwen3 32B
Yi Large Turbo
vs
Allam 2 7B
Yi Large Turbo
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Yi Large Turbo
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Yi Large Turbo
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Yi Large Turbo
vs
Llama 4 Scout