Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Auto (best free model)
Onomeo
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
Unknown
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms Auto (best free model) by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
|
Auto (best free model)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | Unknown |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs) | 12 requests/minute per key |
|
Daily Limit
|
200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models | 30 free-model calls every 5 hours per account |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
Auto (best free model)
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Auto (best free model)
vs
DeepSeek V4 Flash
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Auto (best free model)
vs
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Auto (best free model)
vs
GLM 5.3 Flash
Auto (best free model)
vs
GLM 5.2
Auto (best free model)
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Auto (best free model)
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Auto (best free model)
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
Auto (best free model)
vs
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite