Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Gemma 4 31B
Friendli AI
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms Gemma 4 31B by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
|
Gemma 4 31B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | 262K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs) | Tier 0: adaptive (60 RPM from Tier 1) |
|
Daily Limit
|
200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 31B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
Gemma 4 31B
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
Gemma 4 31B IT
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 4 31B IT
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 4 12B
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 4 12B
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 4 31B (preview)