Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
GLM 5.2
Scaleway Generative APIs
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
256K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms GLM 5.2 by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
|
GLM 5.2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | 256K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs) | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
GLM 5.2
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
Mistral Large
GLM 5.2
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
GLM 5.2
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.8 27B