Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
LFM2.5 2.6B
Kilo AI Gateway
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
65K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms LFM2.5 2.6B by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
|
LFM2.5 2.6B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | 65K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs) | 200 requests/hour per IP on free models (anonymous use allowed) |
|
Daily Limit
|
200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models | Default free models only |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 2.6B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
Kilo Auto Free
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Kilo Auto Free
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Poolside Laguna S 2.1
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Poolside Laguna XS 2.1
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Tencent HY3
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Kilo Auto (Free)
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B