Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 83/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 262K Context

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

Nebius (Token Factory)

Intelligence Score 65/100

Context Window Long context

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms Qwen3.5 397B A17B by 18 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash	Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window	262K Context	Long context
Architecture	Transformer	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~75-79%	~60-64%
Release Date	2024	2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs)	Dynamic limits (adaptive per 15-minute window, not a fixed RPM)
Daily Limit	200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models	Credit-based
Capabilities	No specific data	No specific data
Performance Tier	B-Tier (Strong)	C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate	⚡ Very Fast	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	397B
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	$1 credit is small (good for testing) Limited model selection compared to aggregators Beta features may change
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Nebius Studio: Interactive playground OpenAI Compatibility: Easy swap Cost Effective: Competitive pricing