Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 83/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 262K Context

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

Hetzner Inference API

Intelligence Score 65/100

Context Window 262K

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms Qwen3.6 35B A3B by 18 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash	Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Context Window	262K Context	262K
Architecture	Transformer	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~75-79%	~60-64%
Release Date	2024	2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs)	10 requests, 4M input / 100K output tokens per 60s (per API key)
Daily Limit	200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models	No daily cap published (free while the API is experimental)
Capabilities	No specific data	Vision Reasoning
Performance Tier	B-Tier (Strong)	C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate	⚡ Very Fast	Medium
Primary Use Case	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	35B
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Experimental — no SLA, could be discontinued or paywalled at any time Only one model currently offered No official uptime/support guarantees
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	OpenAI-compatible endpoint — swap base_url + key EU data residency MoE model with 262K context and image input