Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen3.8 27B
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
131K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms Qwen3.8 27B by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
|
Qwen3.8 27B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | 131K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs) | 30 RPM; 8K TPM on most chat models (varies by model) |
|
Daily Limit
|
200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models | 1,000 requests/day and 200K tokens/day on gpt-oss / Qwen (varies by model) |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 27B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
Qwen3.8 27B (GGUF)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B (GGUF)
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
Qwen3.8 27B (GGUF)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B (GGUF)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Allam 2 7B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Whisper Large v3