Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Jamba 1.5 Large
A-TIERAI21 Labs
Intelligence Score
88/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
256K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Jamba 1.5 Large Wins
With an intelligence score of 88/100 vs 65/100, Jamba 1.5 Large outperforms Groq Compound by 23 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Jamba 1.5 Large.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Jamba 1.5 Large
|
Groq Compound
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
256K | 250 RPD, 70k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
SSM-Transformer Hybrid (Mamba) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
100 RPM | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
Groq Compound
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
Groq Compound
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
Groq Compound
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Groq Compound
vs
Qwen3 32B
Groq Compound
vs
Allam 2 7B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B