Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Jamba 1.5 Large
DEPRECATEDAI21 Labs
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
88/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
256K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Qwen 3.8 27B
Cerebras
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
128K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Jamba 1.5 Large Wins
With an intelligence score of 88/100 vs 65/100, Jamba 1.5 Large outperforms Qwen 3.8 27B by 23 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Jamba 1.5 Large.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Jamba 1.5 Large
|
Qwen 3.8 27B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
256K | 128K Context |
|
Architecture
|
SSM-Transformer Hybrid (Mamba) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
100 RPM | 5 RPM, 30K uncached / 90K total TPM, 1M tokens per hour and per day (Free Trial) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 1M tokens/day |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 27B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct