Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
S-TIERDeepInfra
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Qwen 2.5
LLM7.io
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct outperforms Qwen 2.5 by 27 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
|
Qwen 2.5
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM (varies by model) | 30 RPM (no signup) / 120 RPM (free email token) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based (no daily cap) | Up to 5M tokens/day (rolling 24h, with free token) |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
🐢 Slower (Reasoning) | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
405B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Scout (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Llama 4 Scout Instruct (Free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Llama 3.2 3B