Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 405B

S-TIER

Venice.ai

Intelligence Score 91/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

S-TIER

Google AI Studio

Intelligence Score 93/100
Context Window 1M Context, 10 RPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 91/100, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite outperforms Llama 3.1 405B by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 405B
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Context Window
128K tokens 1M Context, 10 RPM
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~88-91%
Release Date
Jul 2024 Dec 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
10 RPM (free tier) 2-15 RPM
Daily Limit
Limited daily usage 1,500 RPD (Flash) / 50 RPD (Pro)
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
🐢 Slower (Reasoning) ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
405B ~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Free tier has speed/rate limits
  • Pro subscription needed for 405B speed
  • Decentralized network variance
  • Data used for training (Unpaid tier)
  • Rate limits are enforced per minute/day
  • No SLA for free tier
Key Strengths
  • Zero-Knowledge Proofs for privacy
  • Uncensored model options
  • Decentralized compute network
  • Multimodal Capabilities
  • Huge Context Window (up to 2M tokens)
  • Fast Inference Speed

Similar Comparisons