Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

DEPRECATED

Requesty

This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

DeepSeek-V4 Pro

A-TIER

DeepSeek

Intelligence Score 80/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 80/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms DeepSeek-V4 Pro by 7 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
DeepSeek-V4 Pro
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~75-79%
Release Date
Jul 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
70B Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • 10M tokens is one-time only
  • API can be slow during peak hours (Chinese business hours)
  • Rate limiting during high demand periods
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • DeepSeek-R1: OpenAI o1-level reasoning (open-source)
  • Mixture-of-Experts architecture for efficiency
  • OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement)

Similar Comparisons