Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

DeepSeek Coder V2

A-TIER

Ollama

Intelligence Score 85/100
Context Window 64K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 85/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms DeepSeek Coder V2 by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
DeepSeek Coder V2
Context Window
128K 64K tokens
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jul 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Hardware limited
Daily Limit
Credit-based Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 💻 Code Generation
Model Size
70B Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Depends on your RAM/GPU
  • Laptop fans will spin up
  • Large models (70B+) need heavy hardware
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Local Inference: Data never leaves your device
  • Modelfiles: Script your own system prompts
  • API: Local REST API for app integration

Similar Comparisons