Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)

S-TIER

OpenRouter

Intelligence Score 96/100
Context Window 1M
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) Wins

With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 87/100, Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 9 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
Context Window
128K 1M
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~92-95%
Release Date
Jul 2024 Dec 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 20 requests/minute
Daily Limit
Credit-based 50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup)
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
70B ~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Limits depend on account history/topup
  • Community key models
  • Free models have lower priority during peak demand
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Unified API for 100+ models from all providers
  • OpenAI-compatible endpoint (drop-in replacement)
  • Automatic model fallback and routing

Similar Comparisons