Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
A-TIERRequesty
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
S-TIEROpenRouter
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 87/100, Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 9 points.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
|
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 1M |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~92-95% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | Dec 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 20 requests/minute |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup) |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Fast | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
70B | ~1.5T (estimated) |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|