Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
87/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.1 405B
S-TIERVenice.ai
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
128K tokens
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 405B Wins
With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 87/100, Llama 3.1 405B outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 4 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
|
Llama 3.1 405B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128K tokens |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 10 RPM (free tier) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Limited daily usage |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Fast | 🐢 Slower (Reasoning) |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
70B | 405B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct