Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

S-TIER

DeepInfra

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 87/100, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~85-87%
Release Date
Jul 2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM (varies by model)
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based (no daily cap)
Capabilities
No specific data
Reasoning
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast 🐢 Slower (Reasoning)
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
70B 405B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • $5 credit is one-time only
  • Credits expire after 90 days
  • Rate limits vary by model
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement)
  • 40+ open-source models hosted
  • Fast inference with optimized serving

Similar Comparisons