Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

A-TIER

Chutes.ai

Intelligence Score 88/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Wins

With an intelligence score of 88/100 vs 87/100, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jul 2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Varies (community capacity)
Daily Limit
Credit-based Subject to availability
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
70B 70B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Availability depends on community GPU donors
  • Speed varies with demand
  • Models may be temporarily unavailable
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Community-powered GPU network
  • Free access to large open-source models
  • OpenAI-compatible API format

Similar Comparisons