Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 8B

Groq

Intelligence Score 78/100
Context Window 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 78/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Llama 3.1 8B by 9 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Llama 3.1 8B
Context Window
128K 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~70-74%
Release Date
Jul 2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Credit-based 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
70B 8B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons